Change for a Harvard policy on single-gender organizations?

A faculty committee will make recommendations to change or revise the policy.

Dean Rakesh Khurana in Harvard Yard

Dean Rakesh Khurana | Photograph courtesy of HPAC

Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana announced today that the existing policy on unrecognized single-gender undergraduate social organizations could be changed or revised by a faculty committee. That policy, set to take effect with the incoming class of freshmen this fall, prevents student members of such organizations from holding leadership positions in recognized undergraduate organizations, and precludes their eligibility for Rhodes, Marshall, and other scholarships that require College endorsement. When it was announced last spring, the policy swiftly drew criticism from faculty and students alike, though for different reasons.

Khurana said he has recommended to Faculty of Arts and Sciences dean Michael D. Smith the establishment of a faculty committee to consider whether the College’s policy on single-gender undergraduate organizations could be improved, “either by changing aspects of its existing structure, or through some broader revision.” The committee, which will be composed of faculty and House deans, members of the educational policy committee and the administrative board, faculty members, students, and staff, will conclude its work by the end of this academic year and present its recommendations in the fall, with time for broader faculty input before those are forwarded to President Drew Faust for approval. In the meantime, Khurana said, the current policy remains in effect.

In a letter to the community, Khurana explained that the committee, in forming its recommendations, will “review data that have been compiled by the College and the University over the past three decades, including Visiting Committee and Overseers reports, survey data, and findings from other colleges and universities, as well as data collected by the University Task Force on Sexual Assault. The committee will also consult with members of faculty-student committees…on issues related to student social life and belonging and inclusion. It will also welcome input from faculty members.”

Discussions of the original sanctions policy, which was announced without prior vote of the faculty, have consumed the better part of the November and December faculty meetings. Khurana’s announcement may defuse tensions over the issue, and allow the faculty to take up other business.

An analysis of the core of the faculty objections to the policy—which range from the procedural, to the practical, to the philosophical—appeared on this site in December. 

 

Read more articles by Jonathan Shaw

You might also like

The division is launching a new fundraising effort to support 50 additional students.

President Alan M. Garber used traditional Memorial Church address to consider the unique qualities of human intelligence and learning.

Due to rain, the University held dual Convocation ceremonies for the Class of 2030 in Sanders Theatre.

Most popular

Harvard’s Class of 2029 Reflects Shifts in Racial Makeup After Affirmative Action Ends

International students continue to enroll amid political uncertainty; mandatory SATs lead to a drop in applications.

The University has pushed the adoption of AI into teaching and operations, but faculty resistance is growing louder.

In 1954, Gregory Corso moved into Eliot House. How he stayed there is a literary legend.

Explore More From Current Issue

A football player in a white jersey evades a defender in a green uniform on the field.

Despite personnel losses, Crimson captain Xaviah Bascon is upbeat about the 2026 season.

Colorful cartoon animals, including dogs, cows, rabbits, and a fence, on a pink background.

Inseparable cows, big dogs fostering a tiny kitten, and a show beagle’s second act

A smiling elderly man in glasses sits comfortably in a striped armchair.

Plus, veteran higher education leader Thomas Ehrlich reflects on university curricula for his 70th reunion