Harvard Files Amicus Brief in Case Against Immigration Ban

The University argues that the president’s immigration ban threatens its academic interests. 

Harvard and seven other Massachusetts universities have filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Louhghalam v. Trump, one of the lawsuits challenging President Donald J. Trump’s executive order banning travel and immigration from seven predominantly Muslim nations.

The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, is broad in scope, calling for a full repeal of the executive order. Harvard and other universities argue in the amicus brief that the ban threatens their academic mission: “Over the course of the past week, amici institutions have seen their students stranded abroad and their faculty members prevented from travelling to and from foreign countries. Scholars based abroad have expressed a determination to boycott academic conferences in the United States, and potential faculty recruits have expressed serious doubts about teaching at amici’s schools. These consequences undermine amici’s bedrock commitment to serving the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the United States, and the world through innovative teaching and research...[I]t is essential that our commitments to national security not unduly stifle the free flow of ideas and people that are critical to progress in a democratic society.” Read the full text of the brief here.

“As the court considers the legal challenge to the executive order, we thought it important to have our voice heard about the significant impact the executive order has hadand will haveon Massachusetts colleges and universities,” said Robert W. Iuliano, senior vice president and general counsel for the University. “The brief provides concrete illustrations of the importance of international students and scholars to our mission and the tangible consequences of the executive order on members of our community and to Harvard as a whole.” Early this week, University president Drew Faust wrote a letter to the Harvard community, titled “We Are All Harvard,” criticizing the travel ban on similar grounds.

The other institutions signing the brief were Boston College, Boston University, Brandeis, MIT, Northeastern, Tufts, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Louhghalam was originally filed on January 28, the same day Trump signed the executive order, and resulted in a temporary stay preventing the enforcement of the order for a week.

Read more articles by Marina N. Bolotnikova
Related topics

You might also like

Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences Appoints a New Finance Dean

Warren Petrofsky joins at a crucial moment when the FAS is dealing with a $350 million deficit.

Harvard Graduates Can Donate Directly to Their Houses on Housing Day

A new initiative encourages small-dollar donations for improving student life.

A Cap on A’s at Harvard? Students and Faculty Raise Concerns at Town Hall

Dozens debate the grade inflation proposal that faculty will discuss next week.

Most popular

Martin Nowak Placed on Leave a Second Time

Further links to Jeffrey Epstein surface in newly released files

Summers Will Retire as Harvard Professor

The former University president is stepping down in the wake of Harvard’s Epstein probe.

Inside Harvard’s Most Egalitarian School

The Extension School is open to everyone. Expect to work—hard.

Explore More From Current Issue

Three climbers seated on a snowy summit, surrounded by clouds, appearing contemplative.

These Harvard Mountaineers Braved Denali’s Wall of Ice

John Graham’s Denali Diary documents a dangerous and historic climb.

A woman gazes at large decorative letters with her reflection and two stylized faces beside them.

The True Cost of Grade Inflation at Harvard

How an abundance of A’s created “the most stressed-out world of all.”

Firefighters battling flames at a red building, surrounded by smoke and onlookers.

Yesterday’s News

How a book on fighting the “Devill World” survived Harvard’s historic fire.