Daniel Lieberman weighs in on “barefoot” running shoes

Support, and a backlash, for the trendy new shoes; a Harvard professor offers an evolutionary perspective.

Running shoes were supposedly designed to help people run long distances without getting injured, but Daniel Lieberman's research suggests humans were doing just fine long before arch supports and shock absorbers were added to their footwear.

In the pages of Harvard Magazine, Lieberman, a professor of anthropology, explained his theory that endurance running was one of the adaptations that gave our ancestors an advantage over other species competing for the same food. And in Sunday's New York Times, Lieberman joined the ranks of experts who think running shoes, at best, don't help much, and may even hurt. That article explored arguments for and against wearing "barefoot" running shoes, typically sheaths of rubber that protect the feet from broken glass and sharp rocks, but otherwise mimic the experience of running without any shoes—separated toes and all. But plenty of people disagreed with Lieberman's camp; one physician, the medical director for the New York Road Runners, told the Times, "In 95 percent of the population or higher, running barefoot will land you in my office."

Most popular

Harvard art historian Jennifer Roberts teaches the value of immersive attention

Teaching students the value of deceleration and immersive attention

How MAGA Went Mainstream at Harvard

Trump, TikTok, and the pandemic are reshaping Gen Z politics.

Jodie Foster Honored at Radcliffe Day 2025

The actress and director discussed her film career and her transformative time at Yale.

Explore More From Current Issue

Catherine Zipf smiling, wearing striped shirt and dark sweater outdoors.

Preserving the History of Jim Crow Era Safe Havens

Architectural historian Catherine Zipf is building a database of Green Book sites.  

Vivian W. Rong sitting on bench outdoors.

Highlighting Harvard Magazine’s Fellows

The 2025-2026 Ledecky and Summer Undergraduate Fellows

Johnston Gate

Your Views on Harvard’s Standoff, Antisemitism, and More

Readers comment on the controversial July-August cover, authoritarianism, and scientific research.