Fareed Zakaria, international affairs commentator, penalized for plagiarism

The 2012 Commencement speaker used excerpts from a Harvard professor’s New Yorker article.

International affairs expert Fareed Zakaria, Ph.D. ’93, LL.D. ’12, the principal speaker at last June’s Commencement, was suspended Friday, at least temporarily, by both Time magazine and CNN for plagiarism after he used uncredited text in his most recent column for Time, datelined August 20. Writing about gun control, Zakaria included specific historical details from an article, “Battleground America,” by Kemper professor of American history Jill Lepore, that appeared in the April 23 issue of The New Yorker.

He is also the host of the CNN international-affairs program GPS and used parts of the same text on his blog; the cable-news channel has therefore disciplined him as well. In a brief statement posted August 10 on his CNN blog page, Zakaria wrote: “I made a terrible mistake. It is a serious lapse and one that is entirely my fault. I apologize unreservedly to her, to my editors at Time and CNN, and to my readers and viewers everywhere.”

A detailed chronology of the incident has been compiled by The Atlantic Wire.

Zakaria was taken to task in the media earlier this summer when news reports noted similarities between his Harvard Commencement address and the speech he had delivered at Duke barely two weeks earlier—a case of borrowing only from himself.

 

Update: On August 16, both Time and CNN revoked their suspensions of Zakaria. CNN issued a statement announcing that its rigorous internal review had found nothing that merited continuing the suspension, and added:

Zakaria has apologized for a journalistic lapse. CNN and Zakaria will work together to strengthen further the procedures for his show and blog.

Time’s announcement, as quoted in the New York Times, stated that the magazine had

completed a thorough review of each of Fareed Zakaria’s columns for Time, and we are entirely satisfied that the language in question in his recent column was an unintentional error and an isolated incident for which he has apologized.

 

Related topics

You might also like

At Harvard, AI Meets “Post-Neoliberalism”

Experts debate whether markets alone should govern tech in the U.S.

Sam Liss to Head Harvard’s Office for Technology Development

Technology licensing and corporate partnerships are an important source of revenue for the University.

Garber to Serve as Harvard President Beyond 2027

A once-interim appointment will now continue indefinitely.

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.

Trump Administration Appeals Order Restoring $2.7 Billion in Funding to Harvard

The appeal, which had been expected, came two days before the deadline to file.

Explore More From Current Issue

A girl sits at a desk, flanked by colorful, stylized figures, evoking a whimsical, surreal atmosphere.

The Trouble with Sidechat

No one feels responsible for what happens on Harvard’s anonymous social media app.

Anne Neal Petri in a navy suit leans on a wooden chair against an exterior wall of Mount Vernon..

Mount Vernon, Historic Preservation, and American Politics

Anne Neal Petri promotes George Washington and historic literacy.

Four men in a small boat struggle with rough water, one lying down and others watching.

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.