Harvard College early admissions increase

Getting a jump on Harvard College’s class of 2018

The College announced today that 992 applicants from a pool of 4,692 had been granted early-action admission to the class of 2018, entering next autumn. In 2012, early-action admission was granted to 892 of 4,845 applicants; and in 2011, when the program was made available after a four-year hiatus, 774 of 4,228 applicants were granted early-action admission. Such admissions are not binding on the applicants, who can decide next spring whether to enroll; thus, the offer of admission differs from early decision—an option not extended by Harvard—which is binding on accepted applicants. (The prior-year data reported here vary slightly from the figures given in earlier accounts; they reflect the numbers distributed with the College’s news announcement of today.)

As the Crimson has pointed out, early-action applicants’ strong inclination to enroll if offered admission (a high “yield” rate) means that members of the regular application pool face an extraordinarily low admission rate—heading toward 3 percent. If all of the 992 early-action applicants offered admission were to matriculate (as is unlikely), there would be about 650 openings left in the class. Some 3,197 early applicants were deferred this year; they and regular-deadline applicants may total some 30,000 or so, competing for those remaining spaces.

Read the news announcement here.

You might also like

Trump Administration Appeals Order Restoring $2.7 Billion in Funding to Harvard

The appeal, which had been expected, came two days before the deadline to file.

At Harvard, AI Meets “Post-Neoliberalism”

Experts debate whether markets alone should govern tech in the U.S.

Sam Liss to Head Harvard’s Office for Technology Development

Technology licensing and corporate partnerships are an important source of revenue for the University.

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.

Death penalty critiqued by Carol and Jordan Steiker

Sibling scholars Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker seek to change how America thinks about capital punishment.

Explore More From Current Issue

Four young people sitting around a table playing a card game, with a chalkboard in the background.

On Weekends, These Harvard Math Professors Teach the Smaller Set

At Cambridge Math Circle, faculty and alumni share puzzles, riddles, and joy.

A stylized illustration of red coral branching from a gray base, resembling a fantastical entity.

This TikTok Artist Combines Monsters and Mental Heath

Ava Jinying Salzman’s artwork helps people process difficult feelings.

A jubilant graduate shouts into a megaphone, surrounded by a cheering crowd.

For Campus Speech, Civility is a Cultural Practice

A former Harvard College dean reviews Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber’s book Terms of Respect.