Change for a Harvard policy on single-gender organizations?

A faculty committee will make recommendations to change or revise the policy.

Dean Rakesh Khurana in Harvard Yard

Dean Rakesh Khurana | Photograph courtesy of HPAC

Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana announced today that the existing policy on unrecognized single-gender undergraduate social organizations could be changed or revised by a faculty committee. That policy, set to take effect with the incoming class of freshmen this fall, prevents student members of such organizations from holding leadership positions in recognized undergraduate organizations, and precludes their eligibility for Rhodes, Marshall, and other scholarships that require College endorsement. When it was announced last spring, the policy swiftly drew criticism from faculty and students alike, though for different reasons.

Khurana said he has recommended to Faculty of Arts and Sciences dean Michael D. Smith the establishment of a faculty committee to consider whether the College’s policy on single-gender undergraduate organizations could be improved, “either by changing aspects of its existing structure, or through some broader revision.” The committee, which will be composed of faculty and House deans, members of the educational policy committee and the administrative board, faculty members, students, and staff, will conclude its work by the end of this academic year and present its recommendations in the fall, with time for broader faculty input before those are forwarded to President Drew Faust for approval. In the meantime, Khurana said, the current policy remains in effect.

In a letter to the community, Khurana explained that the committee, in forming its recommendations, will “review data that have been compiled by the College and the University over the past three decades, including Visiting Committee and Overseers reports, survey data, and findings from other colleges and universities, as well as data collected by the University Task Force on Sexual Assault. The committee will also consult with members of faculty-student committees…on issues related to student social life and belonging and inclusion. It will also welcome input from faculty members.”

Discussions of the original sanctions policy, which was announced without prior vote of the faculty, have consumed the better part of the November and December faculty meetings. Khurana’s announcement may defuse tensions over the issue, and allow the faculty to take up other business.

An analysis of the core of the faculty objections to the policy—which range from the procedural, to the practical, to the philosophical—appeared on this site in December. 

 

Read more articles by Jonathan Shaw

You might also like

Graduate Student Union Schedules Strike

The work stoppage will begin October 27, unless a final bargaining session next week yields an agreement.

Harvard Graduate Student Union Authorizes Another Strike

The University warns this walkout may not be protected by labor law, an assertion the union disputes.

FAS Readies for Administrative Transition

Faculty leaders say layoffs will yield $20 million in annual savings.

Most popular

Harvard Stabilizes Finances With Strong Endowment Returns, Philanthropy

Small operating surplus is dwarfed by reduced federal research support and endowment tax liabilities.

How Philosophy at Harvard Saved Itself

As humanities shrink across higher education, one department is flourishing. Is its success a fluke, or a roadmap?

Treat AI Like a New Species, Harvard Scientist Says

Joshua Joseph discusses how society can manage and coexist alongside self-governing AI agents.

Explore More From Current Issue

Illustration of a phone, book, hourglass, weights, and a hand reaching for a device on a blue background.

Your thoughts on how to regulate the platforms—and stop using them so much

Bronze statue of a seated figure holding a book, with a campus setting in the background.

As humanities shrink across higher education, one department is flourishing. Is its success a fluke, or a roadmap?

Colorful illustration of a split-level house showing various activities in different rooms.

Can the College do more to prepare students for the real world?