Endowment Managers' Compensation Reported

Harvard Management Company has issued its annual report on the compensation of its highest-earning investment professionals...

Harvard Management Company (HMC) has issued its annual report on the compensation of its most highly paid in-house investment professionals. The news, often the subject of close scrutiny, comes at a particularly sensitive time.

The managers' compensation is heavily performance-based: their base salaries are supplemented by substantial bonuses only if they exceed market rates of return in the asset classes for which they are responsible--and, further, sustain that return over time (if performance subsequently lags, bonuses earned but not yet paid out can be "clawed back"). During fiscal year 2008, which ended last June 30, HMC achieved an 8.6 percent return on endowment assets--much better than the 13.1 percent decline in the Standard & Poor's index of large U.S. stocks and even ahead of the 7.1 percent return on the broadest bond-market proxy. The aggregate return for the fiscal year exceeded market returns of 6.9 percent on HMC's benchmarks for its portfolio overall, yielding an extra "value-added" margin of investment return, worth $600 million to the endowment. During the stellar fiscal 2007 year, HMC's aggregate return was 23 percent: 5.8 percentage points better than market benchmarks, representing extra endowment returns of $1.7 billion.

Those halcyon days--which in fact drive much of this year's bonus awards--are of course overshadowed in memory by the recent sharp decline in the value of Harvard's endowment, and those of all known peer institutions, reflecting the rout in financial markets worldwide since last summer. (Whatever the returns for the current fiscal year turn out to be, they may, of course, be relatively better or worse than the performance of the relevant market benchmarks for HMC's asset classes; that, in turn, will figure into compensation awards for future years.)

According to the news release, these were the five highest-paid employees (figures include salaries, bonuses, and benefits):

Stephen Blyth, $6.4 million, Managing Director--International Fixed Income

Marc Seidner, $6.3 million, Managing Director--Domestic Fixed Income

Stanley Zuzic, $4.9 million, Senior Vice President--Domestic Equities

Steven Alperin, $4.4 million. Managing Director--Emerging Market Equities

Andrew Wiltshire,$3.9 million, Managing Director--Natural Resources

In addition, Mohamed El-Erian, former president and CEO, was paid $921,000. He announced his intention to resign and to return to his previous employer in California, in September 2007, and departed that December. 

For past coverage of HMC compensation, including some explanation of the performance-related bonus system, see also here and here.

 

You might also like

At A.R.T., the Musical “Wonder” Explores Bullying and Friendship

Auggie Pullman’s story comes to life through an inventive space metaphor 

Trump Administration Appeals Order Restoring $2.7 Billion in Funding to Harvard

The appeal, which had been expected, came two days before the deadline to file.

At Harvard, AI Meets “Post-Neoliberalism”

Experts debate whether markets alone should govern tech in the U.S.

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

Sign of the Times: Harvard Quarterback Jaden Craig Will Play for TCU

Out of eligibility for the Crimson, the star entered the transfer portal.  

Explore More From Current Issue

An image depicting high carb ultra processed foods, those which are often associated with health risks

Is Ultraprocessed Food Really That Bad?

A Harvard professor challenges conventional wisdom. 

Lawrence H. Summers, looking serious while speaking at a podium with a microphone.

Harvard in the News

Grade inflation, Epstein files fallout, University database breach 

Four men in a small boat struggle with rough water, one lying down and others watching.

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.