Some audience members may have been puzzled by the constitutional history lesson, rather than traditional graduation send-off, that retired Supreme Court associate justice David H. Souter ’61, LL.B. ’66, delivered on the afternoon of Commencement day, May 27—a challenge to the “originalist” or “fair reading” model for interpreting the U.S. Constitution put forward by conservative theorists. Initial media coverage of the speech was low key. But the past week has seen a succession of op-ed columns and editorials acknowledging his contribution to the national debate on the proper role of judges and justices in applying the sometimes contradictory values enunciated by the authors of that fundamental national document. Read responses to the speech by E.J. Dionne Jr. ’73 of the Washington Post; Linda J. Greenhouse ’68, blogging for the New York Times; and the editors of the Los Angeles Times and of the New York Times. Also weighing in, the Keene Sentinel, from Souter's native New Hampshire, and from Great Britain, blogger Michael Tomasky of the Guardian.
Justice Souter’s Speech: A Conversation Begins
The national media again take note of a Harvard Commencement address.
You might also like
Five Questions with Cass R. Sunstein
The Harvard Law professor and constitutional scholar on what Star Wars can tell us about today’s Supreme Court
Harvard Releases Antisemitism and Anti-Muslim Task Force Reports
University publishes findings from thorough examinations of campus conditions.
Harvard Renames Diversity Office
The decision follows pressure from the Trump administration to eliminate DEI practices.
Most popular
Explore More From Current Issue
The Trump Administration's Impact on Higher Education
Unprecedented federal actions against research funding, diversity, speech, and more
89664Paper Peepshows at Harvard's Baker Library
How “paper peepshows” brought distant realms to life
89684