Responses to Justice Souter's Harvard Commencement address

The national media again take note of a Harvard Commencement address.

Some audience members may have been puzzled by the constitutional history lesson, rather than traditional graduation send-off, that retired Supreme Court associate justice David H. Souter ’61, LL.B. ’66, delivered on the afternoon of Commencement day, May 27—a challenge to the “originalist” or “fair reading” model for interpreting the U.S. Constitution put forward by conservative theorists. Initial media coverage of the speech was low key. But the past week has seen a succession of op-ed columns and editorials acknowledging his contribution to the national debate on the proper role of judges and justices in applying the sometimes contradictory values enunciated by the authors of that fundamental national document. Read responses to the speech by E.J. Dionne Jr. ’73 of the Washington Post; Linda J. Greenhouse ’68, blogging for the New York Times; and the editors of the Los Angeles Times and of the New York Times. Also weighing in, the Keene Sentinel, from Souter's native New Hampshire, and from Great Britain, blogger Michael Tomasky of the Guardian.

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

Martin Nowak Sanctioned for Jeffrey Epstein Involvement

The Faculty of Arts and Sciences announces disciplinary actions.

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.

Explore More From Current Issue

Evolutionary progression from primates to humans in a colorful illustration.

Why Humans Walk on Two Legs

Research highlights our evolutionary ancestors’ unique pelvis.

A girl sits at a desk, flanked by colorful, stylized figures, evoking a whimsical, surreal atmosphere.

The Trouble with Sidechat

No one feels responsible for what happens on Harvard’s anonymous social media app.

Four men in a small boat struggle with rough water, one lying down and others watching.

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.