A Letter from the Editor

A letter from the editor

No public figure exists for Harvard’s investment in Allston since the 1980s: property purchases, planning consultants for the research campus envisioned a decade ago, design fees and construction for the halted science complex (about to be rebooted for engineering and applied sciences), permitting and community benefits for recent projects and their price tags, and financing for all of the above—totaling at least many hundreds of millions of dollars. Few if any other universities could have absorbed the cost.

One source of development funds was an annual half-percent “decapitalization” from the endowment put in place by President Neil L. Rudenstine in 2001, for five years, to pay for Allston infrastructure. President Lawrence H. Summers broadened its scope and extended its duration, to reconfigure the campuses old and new. From fiscal 2002 through 2013, that levy has yielded $1.523 billion. (The figure, now 10 percent of the annual endowment operating distribution, is no longer published, and the proceeds are considered a central administrative assessment, not an Allston line item per se.) Those revenues could have paid some of the up-front costs, and supported substantial construction debt.

But as reported in the last issue (page 31), the University has in the meantime incurred another Allston expense: from fiscal 2008 through last year, Harvard paid $1.255 billion to unwind interest-rate swap agreements it put in place in late 2004 to finance planned borrowing for fast-tracked construction. Money is fungible: dollar for dollar, the disbursements from the half-percent decapitalization may not have paid directly for undoing the swaps. But that money had to come from Harvard’s resources, and the facts remain: about $1.5 billion of endowment funds were disbursed; Harvard had to pay $1.255 billion to undo the swaps; effectively, very little of the sum released from the endowment has been available to defray costs to date for actual development in Allston (the original rationale for the assessment)—at a time when the endowment has declined in value, limiting academic budgets.

Recent changes in how administrators and the Corporation manage capital projects and finances should help avoid repeating such costly missteps, as planning for Allston’s future resumes (see page 18). So will Harvard’s new preference for donor and partner funding, instead of debt. More transparency would be desirable, too.

~John S. Rosenberg, Editor

Related topics

You might also like

Free Speech, the Bomb-and Donald Trump

A Harvard cardiologist on the unlikely alliances that shaped a global movement to prevent nuclear war

This Is How Universities Die

Higher ed thrived in Berlin and Beijing. Then government stepped in. 

Alumni Praise Harvard’s Response to Government Demands

Responses to the University’s rejection of federal proposals for intrusive regulation of academic affairs

Most popular

What Trump Means for John Roberts’s Legacy

Executive power is on the docket at the Supreme Court.

This Harvard Scientist Is Changing the Future of Genetic Diseases

David Liu has pioneered breakthroughs in gene editing, creating new therapies that may lead to cures.

Three Harvardians Win Macarthur Fellowships

A mathematician, a political scientist, and an astrophysicist are honored with “genius” grants for their work.

Explore More From Current Issue

Two women in traditional kimonos, one lighting a cigarette, in a scene from Apart from You.

Harvard Film Archive Spotlights Japanese Director Mikio Naruse

A retrospective of the filmmaker’s works, from Floating Clouds to Flowing

James Muller in white lab coat leaning on railing in hospital hallway.

Free Speech, the Bomb-and Donald Trump

A Harvard cardiologist on the unlikely alliances that shaped a global movement to prevent nuclear war

People sit in lawn chairs near a rustic barn at Cider Garden in New Salem on a sunny day.

Ciderdays Festival Celebrates All Things Apple

Visiting small-batch cideries and orchards in Massachusetts