At Harvard, Rowan Williams lectures on the paradoxes of empathy

Former archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams lectures on the paradoxes of empathy.

Rowan Williams

“I feel your pain,” then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton famously declared in 1992, and empathy—coined from the German “Einfühlung,” meaning “feeling into”—is a popular concept. Empathy entails compassion and understanding, the taking of another’s problems as one’s own. Evil itself, argued autism researcher Simon Baron-Cohen, is a matter of “empathy erosion,” the unwillingness or inability to understand the plight of others. “Empathy is like a universal solvent,” he wrote in The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty. “Any problem immersed in empathy becomes soluble.”

Despite that optimism, “The Paradoxes of Empathy” was the title of the 2014 Tanner Lectures on Human Values delivered at Harvard last week by Rowan Williams, archbishop of Canterbury from 2002 to 2012. Fellow feeling alone, he argued, cannot serve as a solution to the world’s problems. “An ethical discourse which gives central place to empathy as emotional identification draws our attention away from questions of culture and power,” he told a packed audience in Paine Hall. “Ethics isn’t just about single acts of evil or virtue. Evil is not overcome merely by identifying and correcting the dysfunction of individual brains. It’s inseparably bound in to what is made possible or impossible by structures of habit, belief, and advantage.”

To define empathy, he turned instead to the work of philosopher Edith Stein (1891-1942; canonized by the Catholic Church as Saint Theresa Benedicta of the Cross), a student of phenomenologist Edmund Husserl. The self is a “zero point of orientation” from which one perceives the world, Stein had argued, and empathy lies in the recognition that every other person is another such zero point—“the awareness of other bodies as alive in the way that my body is alive.” Such awareness entails a self-conscious realization that any single perspective, including one’s own, is necessarily incomplete: “One of the things about bodies,” Williams noted, “is that you can’t see your back, not to mention your eyes.”

Empathy, therefore, is grounded in humility. Quoting Stein, he said, “The empathic position is one in which we know that we are not the other.” “If we were here to speak of an erosion of empathy, it would be more than a failure to appreciate the intensity of another’s experience,” said Williams. “It could just as easily be the overeager appropriation of another’s experience and the denial of its difference and its contingency.” He cautioned against a colonizing mindset that too readily collapses the distance between one’s self and another; empathy, in Stein’s definition, is “corrigible, always something to be learned.” “The ethically significant expression of this sort of empathy would be in saying not, ‘I know how you feel,’” he said, “but, ‘I have no idea how you feel.’” 

Williams ended by arguing for empathy as skill or habit rather than a neurological capacity, a process of learning to grasp “the fluidity and ambiguity of another’s communication, and thus something of the nature of their interiority.” “It is at one level true that empathic awareness is the basic condition necessary for resolving human conflict, but not in the sense that emotional identification with the other provides solutions,” he said in conclusion. “It is as and when we understand ourselves as dependent, as already seen and engaged with in our bodily limitedness, that we at least begin to look critically at the unexamined agenda of self-regard, individual or collective, and the myths of self-sufficient identity that we treasure. That is the beginning, not the end, of the labor we need to find how to speak with each other, and shape a fresh cultural environment in which justice is more likely to be done.”

Videos of the 2014 Tanner Lectures and the accompanying faculty responses are available through the Mahindra Humanities Center. The Tanner Lectures are a collection of educational and scientific discussions relating to human values. Conducted by leaders in their fields, the lectures are presented at a number of educational facilities around the world.

Related topics

You might also like

Boston Board Approves Harvard’s Enterprise Research Campus Framework

City planners adopt principles to guide future development of the commercial innovation district in Allston.

At Harvard, Mitt Romney Warns Against ‘Authoritarian’ Presidential Power

The former senator touched on polarization, tech governance, and diplomacy during a conversation at the Institute of Politics.

Harvard Answers Government Admissions Lawsuit

In a separate case, the Trump administration outlines its argument for the federal funding freeze. 

Most popular

How physical appearance influences authority

Cherubic features benefit black male CEOs, but not other groups, underscoring the complexity of social disadvantage.

A Right Way to Teach Reading?

The science, art, and politics of teaching an essential skill

At Harvard Talk, Retired Supreme Court Justice Breyer Defends Shadow Docket

The current law professor also spoke about affirmative action, partisanship, and the limits of “bright-line rules.”

Explore More From Current Issue

White House and Harvard University buildings split diagonally with contrasting colors.

Harvard Weathers a Year of Turmoil

The federal government has launched unprecedented actions against the University. Here’s a guide.

Bronze statues of three historical figures under a stylized tree in a softly lit space.

The Costly Choice Native Americans Faced

How the Revolution reshaped indigenous New England

Brick archway with a sandy base, surrounded by wooden planks and boxes in a dim space.

How the American Revolution Freed a Future Abolitionist

Darby Vassall, an enslaved child freed after the Battle of Bunker Hill, dedicated his life to fighting for liberty.