FAS Cuts Science Ph.D. Admissions By Half

Backing off plans for more drastic reductions, the division still faces a long-term deficit.

Close-up of a graduate's arm in a red robe with "Harvard" sash during a ceremony.

Photograph by Harvard Magazine

The Faculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS) announced on Wednesday that its science doctoral programs would reduce admissions this year by 50 percent—a reprieve from even deeper proposed cuts, which had prompted an outcry from faculty members.

During the FAS faculty meeting earlier this month, Dean Hopi Hoekstra and other FAS leaders described the division’s $350 million deficit, which amounts to roughly 20 percent of its annual budget, as a structural problem that would require difficult and long-term cuts, including drastic reductions in Ph.D. admissions. According to reporting in The Crimson, FAS leaders were planning to cut the number of admitted science doctoral candidates by as much as 75 percent.

In an email on Wednesday to FAS colleagues, Hoekstra explained that she had backed off that initial number in part because “science departments quickly made clear that graduate education is their highest priority, and essential to the continuity of their research, especially for tenure track faculty.” Doctoral students also play a crucial role in teaching undergraduates at Harvard, and some Ph.D. programs include a teaching requirement.

Hoekstra also noted that as of October 15, the federal government had restored the majority of Harvard’s grant funding previously frozen by the Trump administration. 

“With our circumstances meaningfully changed,” she wrote, “I charged the Research Continuity Committee (RCC) to develop a framework to reconsider graduate admissions to FAS science programs in a manner that supports the excellence of our graduate programs while also protecting the long-term financial health of the FAS mission.” The committee delivered its findings last week, she said, leading to the revised decision.

Programs seeking exceptions to the 50 percent decrease in Ph.D. admissions will be reviewed on a program-by-program basis, Hoekstra wrote, and FAS leaders will take into account non-federal funding and resources that those programs and faculty may be able to use.

Hoekstra wrote that the revised plan will “present incremental financial risk” for the FAS, which will be supported by an extra $250 million in “continuity funding” for research, allocated by the division. 

“This year’s approach is not perfect,” Hoekstra wrote, “but will give us flexibility to meet pressing academic needs while maintaining prudent stewardship of our finances.” The number of Ph.D. slots available for next year’s admissions cycle is yet to be determined.

A previous version of this story misstated the source of the FAS research continuity funding.

Read more articles by Lydialyle Gibson

You might also like

Harvard Scholars Discuss Venezuela After Maduro

A Harvard Kennedy School panel unpacks the nation’s oil sector, economy, and democratic hopes.

Five Questions with Willy Shih

A Harvard Business School professor unpacks the economics of semiconductors.

HAA Announces Overseers and Directors Slate for 2026

Alumni will vote this spring for members of two key governing boards

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

Harvard Commencement 2018

Speakers, ceremonies, and celebrations

Explore More From Current Issue

An axolotl with a pale body and pink frilly gills, looking directly at the viewer.

Regenerative Biology’s Baby Steps

What axolotl salamanders could teach us about limb regrowth

A girl sits at a desk, flanked by colorful, stylized figures, evoking a whimsical, surreal atmosphere.

The Trouble with Sidechat

No one feels responsible for what happens on Harvard’s anonymous social media app.

Two bare-knuckle boxers fight in a ring, surrounded by onlookers in 19th-century attire.

England’s First Sports Megastar

A collection of illustrations capture a boxer’s triumphant moment.