Your Take: Executive Power and the Law

When should a government be permitted to violate its own laws? How should such occurrences be handled after the fact? In this issue's Forum, Charles Fried, Beneficial professor of law at Harvard, and his son Gregory Fried ’83, professor of philosophy at Suffolk University, examine legal and philosophical arguments, with examples from American history. The authors focus their attention on the response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks—and ultimately disagree about whether they favor prosecution of government officials.

Read the article, then answer our question to readers this issue:

Do you think the U.S. government's actions in the wake of 9/11 were justified? Do you favor prosecution for some elements of the response to the terror attacks?

We hope you'll join the conversation by leaving a comment below. (Please note: because this discussion is moderated, your comment will not appear immediately.)

Sub topics

You might also like

The Evolutionary Case for Exercise

The off-label prescription from our hunter-gatherer ancestors

Art Across Borders

At the Lahore Biennale, artists respond to the climate crisis. 

Football: Harvard 35-Holy Cross 34

The Crimson outlasts the Crusaders. Next up: Princeton

Most popular

Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College?

Historian Alexander Keyssar on why the unpopular institution has prevailed 

The Evolutionary Case for Exercise

The off-label prescription from our hunter-gatherer ancestors

The Teen Brain

It’s a paradoxical time of development. These are people with very sharp brains, but they’re not quite sure what to do with them...

More to explore

America's Housing Problem—Explained

America’s housing problem—and what to do about it

How Does the Brain Interpret Language in Real-Time?

New research on how the brain uses sounds to form words and create meaning.

Ecological Edges: Darren Sears’s Watercolor Landscapes

The surreal, artistic cartography of Darren Sears