Your Take: Executive Power and the Law

When should a government be permitted to violate its own laws? How should such occurrences be handled after the fact? In this issue's Forum, Charles Fried, Beneficial professor of law at Harvard, and his son Gregory Fried ’83, professor of philosophy at Suffolk University, examine legal and philosophical arguments, with examples from American history. The authors focus their attention on the response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks—and ultimately disagree about whether they favor prosecution of government officials.

Read the article, then answer our question to readers this issue:

Do you think the U.S. government's actions in the wake of 9/11 were justified? Do you favor prosecution for some elements of the response to the terror attacks?

We hope you'll join the conversation by leaving a comment below. (Please note: because this discussion is moderated, your comment will not appear immediately.)

Click here for the September-October 2010 issue table of contents

Sub topics

You might also like

This is How Universities Die

Higher ed thrived in Berlin and Beijing. Then government stepped in. 

Voices Raised about Harvard

Responses to the University’s rejection of federal proposals for intrusive regulation of academic affairs

Yesterday’s News

Seniors’ uncertain future c. 1940, Harvard Law Review news, and more

Most popular

Christiane Amanpour Points HKS Graduates to Opportunities Abroad

“America needs ambassadors like you,” CNN anchor says.

The Standoff: Harvard’s Future in the Balance

Introducing a guide to the issues, players, and stakes 

Explore More From Current Issue

Walter Wick’s I Spy Series

I Spy Creator Walter Wick at the Norman Rockwell Museum 

Harvard’s Comedy and Improv Scene

In comedy groups, students find ways to be absurd, present, and a little less self-conscious.

Will the U.S. Dollar Always Be So Powerful?

The preeminence of U.S. currency at risk