The idea that objects exist whose gravity is so powerful that light cannot escape them has been around for centuries. But it was not until instruments aboard a rocket detected x-rays from an unseen source in the constellation Cygnus in 1964 that researchers considered the possibility that they had in fact discovered a black hole, an object from which nothing, including light, can escape. Seven years later, astronomers discovered a star in Cygnus orbiting something that could not be seen. “The dark object’s gravity seemed to be tearing gas from its bright companion,” says author and astronomer Ken Croswell, Ph.D. ’90, “and as the gas took the final plunge [see illustration], it became so hot it emitted x-rays.” But not everyone believed a black hole was the cause; in 1974, Stephen Hawking even bet another physicist that it wasn’t. Now the controversy (which Hawking conceded long ago, based on indirect measurements) has been definitively put to rest by Mark Reid and colleagues at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who were able to calculate an accurate distance to Cygnus X-1, making possible an inference of its mass. Furthermore, they calculated that the gas closest to the dark object orbits it almost 670 times per second—a phenomenal rate that is half the speed of light—clear evidence of an object whose gravitational pull is so strong that it could only be a black hole.
A Bet and a Black Hole

You might also like
Radcliffe Institute Announces 2025-2026 Fellows
Scholars pursue projects ranging from reducing ethnic violence to searching for an undiscovered super-Earth.
Taking the Fight for Equality into the AI Era
Radcliffe Institute conference tackles bias, fairness, inclusivity in AI development.
Research on Hold
Funding freeze halts Harvard projects overnight.
Most popular
Explore More From Current Issue
Publications by Harvard Authors Spring 2025: New Releases
Operatic counterculture, a Passover graphic novel, James Joyce’s biographer, and more
Short Headlines from Harvard's History
Seniors’ uncertain future c. 1940, Harvard Law Review news, and more