Jenny F. so Reinterprets Harvard’s Winthrop Collection

A fresh, up-close look at the Winthrop collection

Photograph courtesy of the Harvard Art Museums/Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Bequest of Grenville L. Winthrop,©President and Fellows of Harvard College

Photograph courtesy of the Harvard Art Museums/Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Bequest of Grenville L. Winthrop,©President and Fellows of Harvard College

Photograph courtesy of the Harvard Art Museums/Arthur M. Sackler Museum, Bequest of Grenville L. Winthrop,©President and Fellows of Harvard College

Why do early Chinese jades hold such allure? Their antiquity, for one thing: Neolithic examples date back 7,000 years, commanding attention for the sheer survival of human artifacts. The color of the stone, its worked finish and crisp details, can be ravishing. And the difficulty of the work creates a narrative. During a late-winter lecture at the Harvard Art Museums, Jenny F. So, Ph.D. ’82, explained that nephrite, the classic white jade, is too hard to be carved with sculpting tools; it must instead be shaped with still harder abrasives—the work of months, or years, before powered machinery. She projected a photograph of workers manually bow-sawing a cubic-foot block of jade in China in the 1930s: two weeks to effect the first cut.

Grenville L. Winthrop, A.B. 1886, LL.B. ’89, was among the bewitched: his 1943 bequest to the Fogg included nearly 700 early jades. As a graduate student in the 1970s, So worked with then-Rockefeller professor of Oriental art Max Loehr, who prepared a masterly catalog of the collection published in 1975. After a career including curating the Smithsonian’s ancient Chinese collections and in the academy, at the Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, she has “retired” to consult in the field—including her contemporary reinterpretation of the Winthrop collection, just published as Early Chinese Jades in the Harvard Art Museums. The lush, large format brings readers close to 102 of those objects, many of which are diminutive.

Archaeological discoveries and the opening of China since the 1970s, So details, have expanded understanding of ancient jade: the local sources of supply, and the Neolithic, Bronze Age, and early imperial sites where it was shaped. Some objects can now be dated earlier: a gracefully grooved cuff-like ornament (click on arrow in photo gallery above), for example, 600-300 b.c.e. in Loehr’s reckoning, can now be identified as 2,000-1,700 b.c.e. Material and stylistic analysis of a cylindrical bracelet decorated with animal masks (click on arrow in photo gallery above) suggests that a very ancient provenance may have to compete with a separate interpretation: that this is an eighteenth- or nineteenth-century “archaistic” item made for the imperial collections. Technical analysis of a unique, iconic mirror points to modern fabrication using remnants of ancient components.

So’s most startling findings reflect sheer, dogged scholarship. She has painstakingly interpreted inscribed numbers concealed on the edges of disks and the ends of other jades, from Winthrop’s gift and holdings elsewhere. Some, she believes, are scholar-officials’ marks from millennia ago, reflecting their collecting of jades that were ancient then, to guide the placement of the pieces across their remains when they were buried. Others suggest accession numbers: scholars’ and emperors’ own early museumship and curation of their cherished antiques.

And decades after Loehr documented the two holes in the splendid S-shaped pendant shown (see above), with its dragon head and bird tail, So thinks she knows why. The last step in the arduous crafting of this ornament was drilling the hole by which the owner would suspend it from his belt. For all the prior precision grinding and polishing, the maker appears to have goofed. To get the proper balance, he had to drill a second hole—perhaps the world’s first mulligan. 

Read more articles by John S. Rosenberg
Related topics

You might also like

Rachel Ruysch’s Lush (Still) Life

Now on display at the Museum of Fine Arts, a Dutch painter’s art proved a treasure trove for scientists.

What of the Humble Pencil?

Review: At the Harvard Art Museums’ new exhibit, drawing takes center stage

Harvard Film Archive Spotlights Japanese Director Mikio Naruse

A retrospective of the filmmaker’s works, from Floating Clouds to Flowing

Most popular

What Trump Means for John Roberts’s Legacy

Executive power is on the docket at the Supreme Court.

This Harvard Scientist Is Changing the Future of Genetic Diseases

David Liu has pioneered breakthroughs in gene editing, creating new therapies that may lead to cures.

Three Harvardians Win Macarthur Fellowships

A mathematician, a political scientist, and an astrophysicist are honored with “genius” grants for their work.

Explore More From Current Issue

Illustration of scientists injecting large syringe with mitochondria into human heart.

Do Mitochondria Hold the Power to Heal?

From Alzheimer’s to cancer, this tiny organelle might expand treatment options. 

John Goldberg

Harvard In the News

University layoffs, professors in court, and a new Law School dean

Man in gray sweater standing in hallway with colorful abstract art on wall.

How Do Single-Celled Organisms Learn and Remember

A Harvard neuroscientist’s quest to model memory in single-celled organisms