“Shotgun” Diagnosis

The virtues of inaction in delivering medical care

Stock photo, caring for patient in hospital bed

Often the best (and hardest) thing to do is nothing: “Let’s just keep watching for now.” | Photograph by iStock

We like to think of modern medicine and doctoring as scientific. And so they are, but health outcomes remain subject to chance like every other aspect of life: the heart attack patient who dies despite expert EMT care because road construction delays the ambulance’s path to the hospital that afternoon. That example appears early in Random Acts of Medicine: The Hidden Forces That Sway Doctors, Impact Patients, and Shape Our Health (Doubleday, $30), by Anupam B. Jena, Newhouse professor of healthcare policy, and Christopher Worsham, instructor in medicine—both physicians. From chapter six, on the relative merits of action versus inaction:

 

If pressed, most physicians will admit that they err on the side of more medical care. We ourselves are not immune to it. We’ve given antibiotics when we were pretty sure an infection was viral and didn’t require them; we’ve tested for all kinds of rare and exotic diseases, even when we know the chances of the patient having the disease were extremely low (what some refer to as the “shotgun” approach to diagnosis); we’ve ordered CT scans of every part of the body without expecting to find anything, “just in case.” Most of the time, this care ends up being unnecessary. But every once in a while, what is “unnecessary” yields a finding that saves a life, and the tendency toward more care is reinforced.

How do we solve this conundrum? As the Harvard cardiologist, writer, and national correspondent for The New England Journal of Medicine Dr. Lisa Rosenbaum has written, “Perhaps the most accurate conclusion is that sometimes less is more, sometimes more is more, and often we just don’t know.” It’s a frustrating view of the situation, but as practicing doctors we can’t deny its truth. All we can do is, through continued study and research, try to illuminate the gray areas, in hopes that in time they can be made more black and white.

In the meantime, we’re reminded of a piece of med school advice from a seasoned trauma surgeon evaluating a clinically unstable patient—a quotation originally attributed to a 1940s theater producer frustrated with an overacting cast member: “Don’t just do something: stand there!” Most doctors would have to acknowledge that this is sage advice, if hard advice to accept. Because when you’re standing at the foot of a bed, looking at a patient facing life or death, and you’re asked, “Doctor, what should we do?” often the hardest answer to give is, “Nothing. Let’s just keep watching for now.”

Related topics

You might also like

In her memoir All That's Unseen, Emilee Hackney explores religion, friendship, and home.

Shakespeare and Stephen King Have a Lot in Common

Shakespeare scholar Caroline Bicks studies horror and fear in literature. 

Radcliffe Institute Announces 2026-2027 Fellows

Scholars will tap Harvard’s intellectual resources during the coming academic year.

Most popular

The former economics concentrator brings his talent for crunching numbers to netminding.

Pritzker Hall, designed for collaboration, should be complete in 2027.

Harvard will rename the building following a $100 million gift from Stuart Zimmer ’91.

Explore More From Current Issue

A blue refrigerator covered with animal pictures, notes, and drawings, surrounded by greenery.

An animal’s journey from grief to love shows how much humans need each other, too.

Colorful abstract design resembling an octopus with intricate swirls and patterns.

Growing liver implants, mapping the sense of smell, and journalism at risk

Black and white photo of Joseph Murray in a white lab coat sitting in an office.

Nobel Prize recipient Joseph E. Murray dedicated much of his career to organ transplant surgery.