“Shotgun” Diagnosis

The virtues of inaction in delivering medical care

Stock photo, caring for patient in hospital bed

Often the best (and hardest) thing to do is nothing: “Let’s just keep watching for now.”

Photograph by iStock

We like to think of modern medicine and doctoring as scientific. And so they are, but health outcomes remain subject to chance like every other aspect of life: the heart attack patient who dies despite expert EMT care because road construction delays the ambulance’s path to the hospital that afternoon. That example appears early in Random Acts of Medicine: The Hidden Forces That Sway Doctors, Impact Patients, and Shape Our Health (Doubleday, $30), by Anupam B. Jena, Newhouse professor of healthcare policy, and Christopher Worsham, instructor in medicine—both physicians. From chapter six, on the relative merits of action versus inaction:

 

If pressed, most physicians will admit that they err on the side of more medical care. We ourselves are not immune to it. We’ve given antibiotics when we were pretty sure an infection was viral and didn’t require them; we’ve tested for all kinds of rare and exotic diseases, even when we know the chances of the patient having the disease were extremely low (what some refer to as the “shotgun” approach to diagnosis); we’ve ordered CT scans of every part of the body without expecting to find anything, “just in case.” Most of the time, this care ends up being unnecessary. But every once in a while, what is “unnecessary” yields a finding that saves a life, and the tendency toward more care is reinforced.

How do we solve this conundrum? As the Harvard cardiologist, writer, and national correspondent for The New England Journal of Medicine Dr. Lisa Rosenbaum has written, “Perhaps the most accurate conclusion is that sometimes less is more, sometimes more is more, and often we just don’t know.” It’s a frustrating view of the situation, but as practicing doctors we can’t deny its truth. All we can do is, through continued study and research, try to illuminate the gray areas, in hopes that in time they can be made more black and white.

In the meantime, we’re reminded of a piece of med school advice from a seasoned trauma surgeon evaluating a clinically unstable patient—a quotation originally attributed to a 1940s theater producer frustrated with an overacting cast member: “Don’t just do something: stand there!” Most doctors would have to acknowledge that this is sage advice, if hard advice to accept. Because when you’re standing at the foot of a bed, looking at a patient facing life or death, and you’re asked, “Doctor, what should we do?” often the hardest answer to give is, “Nothing. Let’s just keep watching for now.”

Related topics

You might also like

Parks and Rec Comedy Writer Aisha Muharrar Gets Serious about Grief

With Loved One, the Harvard grad and Lampoon veteran makes her debut as a novelist.

Must-Read Harvard Books Winter 2025

From aphorisms to art heists to democracy’s necessary conditions 

The Artist Edward Gorey—and Pets—at Harvard

Winter exhibits at Houghton Library   

Most popular

Philip J. Deloria, scholar of Native American studies

Philip Deloria studies American Indians and the contradictions that made America.

Yale Chief Will Lead Harvard Police Department

Anthony Campbell will take up his new post in January.

“A Moral Obligation”

Charles Berlin and 60 years of collecting for Harvard Library

Explore More From Current Issue

A man in a gray suit sits confidently in a vintage armchair, holding a glass.

The Life of a Harvard Spy

Richard Skeffington Welch’s illustrious—and clandestine—career in the CIA

An illustrative portrait of Justice Roberts in a black robe, resting his chin on his hand.

What Trump Means for John Roberts’s Legacy

Executive power is on the docket at the Supreme Court.

Six women interact in a theatrical setting, one seated and being comforted by others.

A (Truly) Naked Take on Second-Wave Feminism

Playwright Bess Wohl’s Liberation opens on Broadway.