A Block of Nazi Uranium at Harvard

Proof of a secret Nazi nuclear project

A cube of uranium from Nazi Germany

A cube of uranium from Nazi Germany | Photograph by Jim Harrison

For several decades, Harvard physics professors have shared a small block of uranium with their students. It is a strange 
object: although the cube is only 5 centimeters per side, it feels unbelievably heavy and is cold to the touch. But during its use as a lecture prop, its sinister origin story was not emphasized, says Sara Schechner, Wheatland curator emerita of the Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments (CHSI).

In 1939, as Germany invaded Poland, the Nazi government secretly initiated a nuclear program. Despite this early work, the Germans never managed to sustain or control a nuclear fission chain reaction, the necessary precursor for an atom bomb.

In late 1944, as Allied forces approached, a group of German nuclear physicists working for the Nazi government moved their laboratory to a cave beneath a castle in the small town of Haigerloch. Their final experiment, led by Werner Heisenberg, was the closest the Nazis came to unlocking the secrets of nuclear energy. According to a history of the cubes by University of Maryland physicists, 664 of these nearly identical uranium cubes were arranged into the shape of a chandelier and dipped into a tank of heavy water, but still did not sustain a reaction.

As German resistance collapsed in April 1945, the scientists disassembled their lab, burying the cubes in a field, hiding the heavy water in barrels, and stashing the documentation in a latrine. Soon after, a group of American and British soldiers and scientists—including professor of physics Edwin C. Kemble, Ph.D. ’17—swept through, apprehending their German counterparts and gathering physical evidence.

Schechner is unsure how Kemble, who taught at Harvard for 38 years, managed to keep this block of uranium for himself, nor whether he saw it “as a personal souvenir” or “as evidence.” Nonetheless, she says, it “stands in silent testimony” to “a project that the Nazis long denied.”

The cube was transferred to the collection before CHSI’s formal incorporation in 1968, says executive director Joshua Gorman. Professional practice at the time enabled a long-term loan to a physics instructor who frequently used the item in the classroom. Last year, Gorman says, the cube was returned to CHSI’s safekeeping, after changes within the physics department meant it would no longer be used regularly for instruction.

Back in CHSI’s care, the object can now serve as more than “a hunk of an element,” says Schechner. It can teach about the process of scientific thinking. She noted the significance of the cubes’ standardization. Instead of just tossing uranium chunks into a pile, she says, the German scientists “were making these cubes that are roughly the same size and shape,” demonstrating “the role of measurable units in science.” The cube can also teach about Nazi science, perhaps in conversation with other experiments from that era. Fortunately, given the Nazi regime’s aims and the unlimited nature of that global war, their scientific inquiry fell short. Rather than documenting a toll of potentially millions more lives lost, the small cube of uranium now resides in Harvard’s collection, cased in lead, ready to teach about geopolitics, history, and scientific processes.

Read more articles by Max J. Krupnick
Related topics

You might also like

From competing in youth gymnastics to studying tetrapods, the Harvard curator has always chased her curiosity.

Sheila Jasanoff has spent her career studying how societies produce knowledge, evaluate expertise, and make decisions about technology.

Harvard’s Arthur Kleinman reflects on what’s lost when healthcare systems prioritize efficiency.

Most popular

Harvard art historian Jennifer Roberts teaches the value of immersive attention

Teaching students the value of deceleration and immersive attention

Harvard researchers achieve medical breakthroughs in cancer therapy and infection control.

The 1884 Cannibalism-at-Sea Case That Still Has Harvard Talking

The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens changed the course of legal history. Here’s why it’s been fodder for countless classroom debates.

Explore More From Current Issue

Decorative wrought iron gate framed by leafy branches, captured in sepia tones.

Former Indiana University president Thomas Ehrlich looks back on curriculum, co-education, and other major trends.

A woman with curly blonde hair sits casually against a stone wall, wearing a black top and jeans.

Chloe Chapin trains her Broadway costume designer’s eye on the history of men’s fashion.

A woman with long, wavy hair wearing a white suit, seated in a bright, modern room.

The Harvard graduate’s roundtable talk show touches on hot button issues from religion to sex.