“Shotgun” Diagnosis

The virtues of inaction in delivering medical care

Stock photo, caring for patient in hospital bed

Often the best (and hardest) thing to do is nothing: “Let’s just keep watching for now.”

Photograph by iStock

We like to think of modern medicine and doctoring as scientific. And so they are, but health outcomes remain subject to chance like every other aspect of life: the heart attack patient who dies despite expert EMT care because road construction delays the ambulance’s path to the hospital that afternoon. That example appears early in Random Acts of Medicine: The Hidden Forces That Sway Doctors, Impact Patients, and Shape Our Health (Doubleday, $30), by Anupam B. Jena, Newhouse professor of healthcare policy, and Christopher Worsham, instructor in medicine—both physicians. From chapter six, on the relative merits of action versus inaction:

 

If pressed, most physicians will admit that they err on the side of more medical care. We ourselves are not immune to it. We’ve given antibiotics when we were pretty sure an infection was viral and didn’t require them; we’ve tested for all kinds of rare and exotic diseases, even when we know the chances of the patient having the disease were extremely low (what some refer to as the “shotgun” approach to diagnosis); we’ve ordered CT scans of every part of the body without expecting to find anything, “just in case.” Most of the time, this care ends up being unnecessary. But every once in a while, what is “unnecessary” yields a finding that saves a life, and the tendency toward more care is reinforced.

How do we solve this conundrum? As the Harvard cardiologist, writer, and national correspondent for The New England Journal of Medicine Dr. Lisa Rosenbaum has written, “Perhaps the most accurate conclusion is that sometimes less is more, sometimes more is more, and often we just don’t know.” It’s a frustrating view of the situation, but as practicing doctors we can’t deny its truth. All we can do is, through continued study and research, try to illuminate the gray areas, in hopes that in time they can be made more black and white.

In the meantime, we’re reminded of a piece of med school advice from a seasoned trauma surgeon evaluating a clinically unstable patient—a quotation originally attributed to a 1940s theater producer frustrated with an overacting cast member: “Don’t just do something: stand there!” Most doctors would have to acknowledge that this is sage advice, if hard advice to accept. Because when you’re standing at the foot of a bed, looking at a patient facing life or death, and you’re asked, “Doctor, what should we do?” often the hardest answer to give is, “Nothing. Let’s just keep watching for now.”

Related topics

You might also like

Shakespeare’s Greatest Rival

Without Christopher Marlowe, there might not have been a Bard.

Bringing Korean Stories to Life

Composer Julia Riew writes the musicals she needed to see.

Being Undocumented in America

Karla Cornejo Villavicencio’s writing aims to challenge assumptions. 

Most popular

Two Years of Doxxing at Harvard

What happens when students are publicly named and shamed for their views?

A New Narrative of Civil Rights

Political philosopher Brandon Terry’s vision of racial progress

How MAGA Went Mainstream at Harvard

Trump, TikTok, and the pandemic are reshaping Gen Z politics.

Explore More From Current Issue

Vivian W. Rong sitting on bench outdoors.

Highlighting Harvard Magazine’s Fellows

The 2025-2026 Ledecky and Summer Undergraduate Fellows

Julie Riew, wearing a white dress, playing guitar and singing into a microphone on stage.

Bringing Korean Stories to Life

Composer Julia Riew writes the musicals she needed to see.

Colorful illustration of woman multitasking with laptop, baby bottle, toy, and checklist.

Motherhood and Ambition in a Pronatalist World

Gen Z is confronting the age-old question of balance—with a new twist.