A Cucumber Coil Conundrum

Grasping cucumber tendrils coil in two different directions. Close study led to the discovery of a new type of spring.

Grasping cucumber tendrils coil in two different directions. Close study led to the discovery of a new type of spring. | Photograph by Josh Puzey

A lignified fiber from a coiled tendril, greatly  magnified

A lignified fiber from a coiled tendril, greatly magnified| Photograph by Josh Puzey

L. Mahadevan website

[extra: Extra] View a time-lapse video of how the cucumber tendril coils and overwinds below

The cucumber tendril has long fascinated observant gardeners. This specialized plant stem grows straight at first—until it reaches the nearest trellis or fence post. Then it changes shape, wrapping around the object, twisting into tiny coils, and gaining a support structure for its efforts to grow toward the sun.

These grasping tendrils have also intrigued scientists for centuries; Charles Darwin explored the topic in On the Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants, published in 1865. He noted that a coiled cucumber tendril twists in one direction and then the other, with the two sections joined in the middle by a straight piece that he termed the “perversion.” Many scientists have studied cucumber tendrils since then, but important questions remained unanswered: Just how does the tendril curl? And how do these coils benefit the plant?

These were ideal questions for the team led by L. Mahadevan, de Valpine professor of applied mathematics. Mahadevan’s research seeks to explain everyday phenomena, such as how flags flutter, why Venus flytraps snap shut, or how the petals of a lily form and unfurl; he describes himself as part applied mathematician, part physicist, and part biologist (See detailed coverage of this earlier work in “The Physics of the Familiar,” March-April 2008, p. 46). He first wondered about cucumber tendrils as a graduate student, but didn’t pursue the topic until postdoctoral student Sharon Gerbode (now assistant professor of physics at Harvey Mudd College) joined his lab. Aided by graduate students Josh Puzey (biology) and Andrew McCormick (physics), the researchers used their mix of disciplines to understand the elusive tendril. “We do whatever it takes to study problems in my group,” Mahadevan says. “We are not just theorists, or just experimentalists, not just mathematicians or physicists or engineers. Nature certainly does not care; she is subtle, and it is up to us to tease out how she works.”

The team began by dissecting the tendril at various points in its development and found a thin ribbon of gelatinous fibers, running the length of the stem, that becomes woody—or “lignifies”—over time. As it ages, this rigid strand also loses water and shrinks, and that combination of lignification and shrinkage pulls the entire tendril into its coiled shape.

Once they understood the biological mechanism of the coil, the team wanted to represent it with physical models. “As a scientist, if I understand something, I should be able to recreate it,” Mahadevan explains. Using ordinary materials including rubber, glue, copper wire, and tape, the researchers made numerous tendril models until they arrived at one that behaved like a real cucumber tendril. It allowed them to explore something surprising that they’d noted in live tendrils: when pulled from opposite ends, the coil does not straighten, but first overwinds, adding more turns to both helices before it eventually straightens.

The team also developed mathematical models that allowed it to understand the mechanical properties of the coil. Mahadevan points out that Darwin presciently called the cucumber tendril “an excellent spring,” and the Harvard researchers quantified the structure, discovering in the process a new type of spring. With its two opposite-handed helices joined by the straight perversion in the center, the spring responds flexibly to varying levels of force. It’s pliant when pulled gently, and grows stiffer when pulled more forcefully. The stiffer the spring becomes, the more tightly it curls, and the presence of the perversion allows it to freely overwind or underwind. The team’s findings appeared in the journal Science last summer.

Mahadevan sees benefits for the cucumber: when a tendril is young and especially tender, and first winding onto a nearby trellis, a weak connection would be helpful. “If the wind blows or there is a disturbance of some other kind, then you don’t want the whole thing to fall apart,” he explains. “You want a relatively soft response.” But as the tendril develops tighter connections to a trellis over time, it grows woodier and reacts more strongly to any pulling, protecting the mature plant.

Mahadevan stresses that his team didn’t set out to discover a new type of spring, and he’s unconcerned about future applications of these and other discoveries. He explains that his research is motivated by pure curiosity. “I work on things because I want to understand how the world works,” he says. “I’m fortunate to be part of a system that still in some small degree, I hope, will value it. The deep truth is that I worked on this the way I have worked on other problems—because it is human to be curious.”

Read more articles by: Erin O'Donnell

You might also like

Slow and Steady

A Harvard Law School graduate completes marathons in all 50 states.  

Claudine Gay in First Post-Presidency Appearance

At Morning Prayers, speaks of resilience and the unknown

The Dark History Behind Chocolate

A Harvard course on the politics and culture of food

Most popular

Claudine Gay in First Post-Presidency Appearance

At Morning Prayers, speaks of resilience and the unknown

Who Built the Pyramids?

Not slaves. Archaeologist Mark Lehner, digging deeper, discovers a city of privileged workers.

Harvard College Reinstitutes Mandatory Testing

Applicants for the class of 2029 must submit scores.

More to explore

Winthrop Bell

Brief life of a philosopher and spy: 1884-1965

Capturing the American South

Photographs at the Addison Gallery of American Art 

The Happy Warrior Redux

Hubert Humphrey’s liberalism reconsidered