Crisis of American neoliberal capitalism

A critique of the neoliberal economy

The financial crisis and ensuing Great Recession surprised most economists and policymakers, writes David M. Kotz ’65, professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst (and Distinguished Professor at the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics). Depression-like collapses were thought to be “no longer possible in contemporary capitalism.” But he reinterprets these economic difficulties in The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism (Harvard, $39.95). From the introduction:

 

In 2008 a severe financial and broad economic crisis broke out in the United States. It rapidly spread to much of the global financial and economic system.…While the acute stage of financial collapse and economic free-fall at the start of the crisis has passed, it has been followed by a period of stagnation and economic instability….

This crisis issued from the particular form of capitalism in the United States in recent decades, often called free-market, or neoliberal, capitalism. Neoliberal capitalism arose around 1980, first in the United States and the United Kingdom, replacing the quite different “regulated capitalism” that had preceded it. It soon spread to many, although not all, other countries, and came to dominate the global-level economic institutions of this era.

…In brief, in neoliberal capitalism market relations and market forces operate relatively freely and play the predominant role in the economy. By regulated capitalism we mean a form of capitalism in which such non-market institutions as states, corporate bureaucracies, and trade unions play a major role in regulating economic activity, restricting market relations and market forces to a lesser role in the economy.…

[T]he crisis that began in 2008 is not just a financial crisis, or a particularly severe recession—or a combination of the two. It is a structural crisis of the neoliberal form of capitalism.…[T]he crisis, unlike an ordinary business cycle recession, cannot be resolved within the current structural form.…Even a bold Keynesian policy of fiscal expansion through big increases in public spending, while capable of stimulating faster economic growth and creating more jobs for a time, would not in itself resolve the underlying structural problem that is blocking a resumption of a normal trajectory of profit-making and economic expansion over the long run. Rather, major structural change in the economy and other related aspects of society represents the only route to resolving the current crisis, a view that finds support from the history of the resolution of past structural crises in the United States such as that of the 1930s.

You might also like

Bringing Korean Stories to Life

Composer Julia Riew writes the musicals she needed to see.

Harvard Summer Reading Picks | 2025

The wealth gap, shamanism, the life of David Nathan, and more

Matt Levine's Bloomberg Finance Column Makes Money Funny

Matt Levine’s spunky Bloomberg column

Most popular

How MAGA Went Mainstream at Harvard

Trump, TikTok, and the pandemic are reshaping Gen Z politics.

Harvard art historian Jennifer Roberts teaches the value of immersive attention

Teaching students the value of deceleration and immersive attention

Shakespeare’s Greatest Rival

Without Christopher Marlowe, there might not have been a Bard.

Explore More From Current Issue

Man splashing water on his face at outdoor fountain beside woman holding cup near stone building.

Why Heat Waves Make You Miserable

Scientists are studying how much heat and humidity the human body can take.

People sit in lawn chairs near a rustic barn at Cider Garden in New Salem on a sunny day.

CiderDays Festival Celebrates All Things Apple

Visiting small-batch cideries and orchards in Massachusetts