Open Access proponent Peter Suber, briefly profiled

The open-access proponent works to increase the flow of scholarly information.

Peter Suber

Peter Suber | Photograph by Stu Rosner

Peter Suber’s life bridges multiple places, passions, and positions. He has cycled across America, scooted around Sweden on a Vespa, and voyaged to Antarctica with a boatful of polar biologists who were conducting a penguin census. Now, he juggles a family life in Maine and a professional calling in Cambridge. At Harvard, he serves simultaneously as director of the Office for Scholarly Communication (an arm of the library system) and director of Harvard’s Open Access Project (sponsored by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society). Both offices advance the cause of open access, a movement to provide scholarly work to the Internet-going public free of charge. Suber’s interest in open access ignited when, in the early days of the Internet, he began republishing his own scholarly work in philosophy on his personal website. The reaction surprised and invigorated him: his experiment of freely sharing his work online gained more readers, and more engagement, than his official publications did. “What started as a geeky excuse to play with HTML,” he says, “turned into the realization that the Web was a serious medium for scholarship.” Ever since, he has worked to fix an academic-publishing environment he believes is broken: that doesn’t reach the readership it should, or could, because it erects, maintains, and jealously polices barriers to scholarly information (see “The ‘Wild West’ of Academic Publishing”). The journey has led to his recent full-time, double-duty appointment. In his office, a particularly important photograph hangs on the wall. One of his daughters took it for a photography-class assignment about “Objects of Desire.” It depicts books. Some are closed, and some, much to Suber’s delight, lie open.

Related topics

You might also like

Jason Furman: Capitalism Is Working. It Could Work Better.

On Open to Debate, the Harvard economist defended free market competition—with meaningful government involvement. 

Two Scientists Bring the Laboratory to the Stage

The play Spare Parts is a contemporary fable about the quest to live forever.

Don’t Call Stephanie Pierce A Paleontologist

From competing in youth gymnastics to studying tetrapods, the Harvard curator has always chased her curiosity.

Most popular

Trump Administration Asks Appeals Court to Restore Harvard Funding Cuts

The government’s lawyers homed in on a jurisdictional argument for its authority to to terminate federal grants. 

Trump Administration Will Investigate Alleged Visa Fraud at Harvard

The announcement comes two days after a federal appeals court heard arguments about an international students ban.

Harvard Weathers a Year of Turmoil

The federal government has launched unprecedented actions against the University. Here’s a guide.

Explore More From Current Issue

Colorful word cloud with various emotions and ideas related to learning and reflection.

But it can’t replace human connection.

Two laboratory researchers, one seated and one standing, in a scientific lab with equipment.

The stakes are high for this husband and wife: one of them will die if they don’t find a cure.

A flooded office scene with computers, a woman working, and a pink sunset backdrop.

A College student’s attempt to recapture the romanticism of the workplace.