Nicholas Stephanopoulos

An election-law scholar and litigator zeroes in on political gerrymandering.

portrait photograph of Nicholas Stephanopoulos in a casual shirt and jeans

Nicholas Stephanopoulos

Photograph by Jim Harrison

Nicholas Stephanopoulos was a second-year law student at Yale when the Supreme Court ruled—unsatisfactorily, he believed—on the 2004 Pennsylvania gerrymandering case Vieth v. Jubelirer. Splitting 5-4, the justices upheld the state’s partisan Congressional districts and left unresolved the question of whether the courts should have a say in political gerrymandering. For Stephanopoulos, now Kirkland & Ellis professor of law, the case was a game-changer: election law, democratic theory, and the American electoral system came to dominate his career. Gerrymandering is a particular fixation—he’s best known for developing a quantitative measure of partisan bias in districting that became the basis of lawsuits in North Carolina and Wisconsin, which he helped litigate all the way to the Supreme Court (where both ultimately lost). Stephanopoulos ’01, who studied government at the College, is writing a book about the concept of alignment: how closely government policies and actions reflect voters’ wishes. “Alignment is at the heart of what it means to be a real democracy,” he says, and the “most powerful tools” working against it include voter suppression (Stephanopoulos has sharply criticized recent Supreme Court decisions undermining the Voting Rights Act), money in politics, and, of course, gerrymandering. These are obsessions he shares with his wife, Ruth Greenwood, visiting assistant clinical professor and director of Harvard’s new Election Law Clinic. The cake at their 2015 wedding featured a blue-icing version of Illinois’s earmuff-shaped 4th Congressional district, with boundaries drawn to give Latino voters greater representation (not all “‘funny-looking’ districts are bad,” he notes). For election-law scholars like them, the past year has been riveting—and worrying: following the 2020 census, every state is set to redraw its district maps next year, “and I think we’re about to see some of the most aggressive gerrymanders in American history.” 

Read more articles by Lydialyle Gibson
Related topics

You might also like

At Harvard, Mike Pence Discusses Democracy and Conservatism

The former vice president denounces political violence, expresses hope for a deal between Trump and the University.

Is the Constitution Broken?

Harvard legal scholars debate the state of our founding national document.

Harvard Panel Debunks the Population Implosion Myth

Public health professors parse the evidence surrounding falling U.S. birth rates.

Most popular

What Trump Means for John Roberts’s Legacy

Executive power is on the docket at the Supreme Court.

Harvard Layoffs Continue, with More to Come

In the wake of federal government actions, several Harvard schools and institutes are cutting costs.

Shakespeare’s Greatest Rival

Without Christopher Marlowe, there might not have been a Bard.

Explore More From Current Issue

Colorful illustration of woman multitasking with laptop, baby bottle, toy, and checklist.

Motherhood and Ambition In a Pronatalist World

Gen Z is confronting the age-old question of balance—with a new twist.

Renaissance portrait of young man thought to be Christoper Marlowe with light beard, wearing ornate black coat with gold buttons and red patterns.

Shakespeare’s Greatest Rival

Without Christopher Marlowe, there might not have been a Bard.

Illustrated world map showing people connected across countries with icons for ideas, research, and communication.

Why Harvard Needs International Students

An ed school professor on why global challenges demand global experiences