Civil Rights in the American West

A new book chronicles one man’s quest for a Black state.

Book cover of "Black Moses" by Caleb Gayle with subtitle about ambition and the fight for a Black state.

In Black Moses: A Saga of Ambition and the Fight for a Black State (Riverhead, $33), journalist and Northeastern University professor Caleb Gayle, M.B.A.-M.P.P. ’19, tells the story of African American leader Edward McCabe. The businessman and rising political star tried to found a state for Black people in the wake of the American Civil War and Reconstruction. And he nearly succeeded. The passage below, adapted by the author from the book’s penultimate chapter, gives a sense of what McCabe was up against.

Public memory of civil rights lawsuits often centers on the South, overlooking the ways Black ambition collided with legal limits in the American West. But a closer look at one Oklahoma lawsuit—filed by a once-powerful Black political figure—reveals just how early and deliberately the law worked to shut that ambition down.

Edward McCabe
Edward McCabe | PHOTOGRAPH IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN

By the 1910s, Edward McCabe—once the most influential Black political figure in the Oklahoma Territory—had seen his grand vision of a Black-governed Oklahoma unravel. But if political ambition was no longer a viable path, McCabe found a new battleground: the courts. In his final act of public resistance, he filed suit against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company—a case that would reach the U.S. Supreme Court and spotlight the limits of equality under the law.

The injustice was both symbolic and structural.

The very first law passed by Oklahoma’s newly formed legislature mandated racially segregated train cars. It was more than policy—it was priority. While white passengers were guaranteed quality accommodations, Black passengers who purchased the same tickets were frequently denied comparable service in the “Negro Cars.” McCabe had recruited thousands of Black people to Oklahoma who experienced this disparity firsthand. He brought suit in his own name, arguing that the company’s refusal to provide equivalent first-class cars for Black travelers violated both Oklahoma’s Separate Coach Law and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Despite losing in lower courts, McCabe pushed forward. In 1914, McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. reached the U.S. Supreme Court. He no longer held political office; his former newspaper was collecting dust; and his finances were dwindling. What he had was a name on a lawsuit that dared to test whether “separate” would ever be meaningfully equal.

But the Supreme Court didn’t rule in McCabe’s favor because he had not personally been denied service, and the Court declined to weigh in on the law’s application. In doing so, it sidestepped the deeper issue at the heart of McCabe’s claim: that discrimination was not merely a hypothetical—it was a pattern hiding behind technicality.

Still, by bringing the case forward, McCabe exposed something foundational about Oklahoma’s—and the American West’s—new identity. The state’s first legislative act had not been to build a school, fund a bridge, or extend the vote. It had been to codify separation—to declare, from day one, who this state was for.

This lawsuit would be McCabe’s final major public act. He would not found another all-Black town or hold another office. But in placing his name before the highest court in the land, he insisted that Black citizens had not given up on equal treatment—even if the legal system seemed determined to defer that possibility to someone else, some other day.

Sometimes, the last stones a man turns over are the ones that reveal just how much of him still refuses to be buried.

You might also like

Will the U.S. Dollar Always Be So Powerful?

The preeminence of U.S. currency at risk

Harvard Professor on Printmaking

An art historian analyzes an overlooked medium.

Open Book

Michael Ignatieff on Abraham Lincoln on solace

Most popular

How MAGA Went Mainstream at Harvard

Trump, TikTok, and the pandemic are reshaping Gen Z politics.

Harvard art historian Jennifer Roberts teaches the value of immersive attention

Teaching students the value of deceleration and immersive attention

Shakespeare’s Greatest Rival

Without Christopher Marlowe, there might not have been a Bard.

Explore More From Current Issue

Illustration of college students running under a large red "MAGA" hat while others look on with some skeptisim.

How MAGA Went Mainstream at Harvard

Trump, TikTok, and the pandemic are reshaping Gen Z politics.

Nineteenth-century prison ruins with brick guardhouse surrounded by forest.

This Connecticut Mine Was Once a Prison

The underground Old New-Gate Prison quickly became “a school for crime.”

Karla Cornejo Villavicencio smiling beside the pink cover of her novel "Catalina" featuring a jeweled star and eye.

Being Undocumented in America

Karla Cornejo Villavicencio’s writing aims to challenge assumptions.