Civil Discourse and Institutional Neutrality Task Forces

Two Harvard working groups assess constructive dialogue, institutional voice

From left: Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Noah Feldman, Eric Beerbohm, Alison Simmons

From left: Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Noah Feldman, Eric Beerbohm, Alison Simmons |  photographs From left: rose lincoln, stephanie mitchell, stephanie mitchell, rose lincoln; montage by niko yaitanes/harvard magazine

Alan M. Garber, interim president since January 2, and John F. Manning, interim provost since March 14, today announced a pair of University-wide working groups. The “Institutional Voice Working Group” will consider when and if Harvard should take public positions on political issues. The “Open Inquiry and Constructive Dialogue Working Group” will examine how the University can foster civil discourse on campus.

When Garber named Manning interim provost last month, he tasked Manning with tackling both institutional voice and civil discourse. After Harvard’s wavering statements following Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack on Israel initiated campus chaos, the University began to consider adopting a position of institutional neutrality (first reported by the Harvard Crimson). And after a fall of convulsive campus protests, this spring, the University has focused on fostering respectful disagreement. The College hosted an undergraduate civil discourse summit, and the Kennedy School released a thorough analysis of its speech climate.

In their initial announcement, Garber and Manning appointed a pair of professors to lead the Institutional Voice Working Group: Frankfurter professor of law Noah Feldman and Wolcott professor of philosophy Alison Simmons. The group, the announcement says, will “recommend concrete answers to questions such as: Should the University make official, institutional declarations about matters of social and political significance? Who is authorized to speak for the University on these issues, and how?” Some of these issues were debated at a recent Radcliffe Institute forum, reported here.

The Open Inquiry and Constructive Dialogue Working Group will be led by Eric Beerbohm, director of the Safra Center for Ethics and faculty dean of Quincy House, and Radcliffe Dean Tomiko Brown-Nagin. Both have already worked on leading difficult conversations, Beerbohm as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ senior adviser on civil discourse, and Brown-Nagin through her role at Radcliffe. Garber and Manning say this group will examine “how to foster engagement across differing viewpoints as we teach, learn, and interact more broadly with one another throughout the University.”

Garber and Manning write that these groups are “critical to the success of Harvard’s mission of teaching, learning, and research,” and continue:

Success in pursuing this core mission is dependent on free, open, and constructive discourse among the University’s many members. Excellence in discovery and learning requires the ability to advance ideas and explore them fully, to challenge accepted wisdom, to disagree productively, and to recognize that we will often make mistakes as we learn. It is the University’s unwavering commitment to academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas that makes all of this possible.

The full task force memberships are detailed here.

Read more articles by Max J. Krupnick

You might also like

Muslim American Life after October 7

A Radcliffe Institute discussion on repression and free speech

Barley Recipe (Orzotto) by Chef Mario Marini

Climate- and heart-friendly barley with crunchy chickpeas & almonds topped with balsamic vinegar

Orchard Elixir by Mixologist Willa Van Nostrand

An orchard elixir mocktail for the holidays—healthy, festive, and organic

Most popular

Home Unaffordable Home

America’s housing problem—and what to do about it

The World’s Costliest Health Care

Administrative costs, greed, overutilization—can these drivers of U.S. medical costs be curbed?

Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College?

Historian Alexander Keyssar on why the unpopular institution has prevailed 

Explore More From Current Issue

Do Ivy League Athletes Outperform in Careers?

How does undergraduate participation in varsity sports enhance career success?