Harvard Alumnus Wins Chemistry Nobel

David Baker ’84 invents new proteins not found in nature.

David Baker

David Baker | PHOTOGRAPH BY Michael Nalley/Howard Hughes Medical Institute

David Baker ’84, a biochemistry professor at the University of Washington, has been named a winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for creating entirely new proteins. In 2003, using a software platform he had invented called Rosetta, Baker designed a protein made of 93 amino acids and synthesized it in his lab. It was, the Nobel announcement said, “unlike any other protein.” Since then, Baker has created numerous other proteins that catalyze reactions not found in nature and whose functions can be used in pharmaceuticals, vaccines, nanomaterials, and tiny sensors. He and his lab now use artificial intelligence (AI) methods in their work. Baker heads the University of Washington’s Institute for Protein Design.

Baker shares the prize with John Jumper and Demis Hansabis of Google DeepMind in London, who won for their work using AI to predict the structure of millions of proteins, allowing researchers to better understand antibiotic resistance and create images of enzymes that can break down plastic.

On his faculty webpage, Baker describes his work this way: “Our research is focused on the prediction and design of protein structures, protein folding mechanisms, protein-protein interactions, protein-nucleotide interactions, and protein-ligand interactions. Our approach is to use experiments to understand the fundamental principles underlying these problems, to develop simple computational models based on these insights, and to test the models through structure prediction and design.”

Baker told an interviewer at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, where he is an investigator, that his initial interest in protein folding began when he was an undergraduate biology concentrator at Harvard: “We had to write a term paper on something to do with biochemistry, and I asked the professors if I could look at protein folding,” he said. “They discouraged me, saying ‘no one really knows how it works.’” Years later, as researcher with his own lab, he returned to the question and answered it.

Read more articles by Lydialyle Gibson

You might also like

Trump Administration Appeals Order Restoring $2.7 Billion in Funding to Harvard

The appeal, which had been expected, came two days before the deadline to file.

At Harvard, AI Meets “Post-Neoliberalism”

Experts debate whether markets alone should govern tech in the U.S.

Sam Liss to Head Harvard’s Office for Technology Development

Technology licensing and corporate partnerships are an important source of revenue for the University.

Most popular

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

The Franklin Stove—A Historical Climate Change Adaptation

Historian Joyce E. Chaplin reinterprets an early era of invention, industrialization, and climate challenge

What Trump Means for John Roberts’s Legacy

Executive power is on the docket at the Supreme Court.

Explore More From Current Issue

Evolutionary progression from primates to humans in a colorful illustration.

Why Humans Walk on Two Legs

Research highlights our evolutionary ancestors’ unique pelvis.

An axolotl with a pale body and pink frilly gills, looking directly at the viewer.

Regenerative Biology’s Baby Steps

What axolotl salamanders could teach us about limb regrowth

Historic church steeple framed by bare tree branches against a clear sky.

Harvard’s Financial Challenges Lead to Difficult Choices

The University faces the consequences of the Trump administration—and its own bureaucracy