Harvard Alumnus Wins Chemistry Nobel

David Baker ’84 invents new proteins not found in nature.

David Baker

David Baker | PHOTOGRAPH BY Michael Nalley/Howard Hughes Medical Institute

David Baker ’84, a biochemistry professor at the University of Washington, has been named a winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for creating entirely new proteins. In 2003, using a software platform he had invented called Rosetta, Baker designed a protein made of 93 amino acids and synthesized it in his lab. It was, the Nobel announcement said, “unlike any other protein.” Since then, Baker has created numerous other proteins that catalyze reactions not found in nature and whose functions can be used in pharmaceuticals, vaccines, nanomaterials, and tiny sensors. He and his lab now use artificial intelligence (AI) methods in their work. Baker heads the University of Washington’s Institute for Protein Design.

Baker shares the prize with John Jumper and Demis Hansabis of Google DeepMind in London, who won for their work using AI to predict the structure of millions of proteins, allowing researchers to better understand antibiotic resistance and create images of enzymes that can break down plastic.

On his faculty webpage, Baker describes his work this way: “Our research is focused on the prediction and design of protein structures, protein folding mechanisms, protein-protein interactions, protein-nucleotide interactions, and protein-ligand interactions. Our approach is to use experiments to understand the fundamental principles underlying these problems, to develop simple computational models based on these insights, and to test the models through structure prediction and design.”

Baker told an interviewer at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, where he is an investigator, that his initial interest in protein folding began when he was an undergraduate biology concentrator at Harvard: “We had to write a term paper on something to do with biochemistry, and I asked the professors if I could look at protein folding,” he said. “They discouraged me, saying ‘no one really knows how it works.’” Years later, as researcher with his own lab, he returned to the question and answered it.

Read more articles by Lydialyle Gibson

You might also like

What of the Humble Pencil?

Review: At the Harvard Art Museums’ new exhibit, drawing takes center stage

At Harvard College Convocation, an Emphasis on Open-Mindedness

Garber, other leaders sidestep politics but welcome international students.

‘Passengers’ at A.R.T. Blends Acrobatics with Einstein’s Relativity

Review: Quantum mechanics meets circus arts at the American Repertory Theater’s performance

Most popular

Is the Constitution Broken?

Harvard legal scholars debate the state of our founding national document.

Paolo Pasco and the art of making crosswords

Paolo Pasco and the art of making crosswords

Harvard Research Funding Will Resume, Government Signals

Notices of grant reinstatements follow a court ruling, but the Trump administration could still appeal. 

Explore More From Current Issue

Man in gray sweater standing in hallway with colorful abstract art on wall.

How Do Single-Celled Organisms Learn and Remember?

A Harvard neuroscientist’s quest to model memory

Johnston Gate

Your Views on Harvard’s Standoff, Antisemitism, and More

Readers comment on the controversial July-August cover, authoritarianism, and scientific research.