Harvard’s core curriculum

The College’s general-education courses, revised

Return to main article:

Beginning in the fall of 2018, Harvard undergraduates will find themselves on a somewhat altered academic trajectory, as the revised Program in General Education takes effect. Following review of the Gen Ed curriculum that took shape a decade ago—under which students had to take one course each from eight broadly defined areas—the faculty decided in 2016 to alter its earlier handiwork. The resulting new framework requires one course each from four broad “perspectives” (Aesthetics & Culture; Histories, Societies, Individuals; Science & Technology in Society; Ethics & Civics); a distribution requirement (one course each from arts and humanities; social sciences; and sciences and engineering); and a new course demonstrating “quantitative facility” (the current definition of which, “thinking with data,” remains to be clarified, given some concerns recently raised by mathematicians—see “Pending Business: Maths”).

This segment of their education aims to “prepare students for meaningful lives of civic and ethical engagement in an ever changing world.” The faculty’s intent in defining the Gen Ed categories and devising the courses that qualify is to “help students to understand the deep relationship of scholarly work to some of the most important aspects of life beyond college. Gen Ed aims to produce practical wisdom: it asks Harvard students to consider how they will best use their liberal arts and sciences educations, and their lives, in the service of both knowledge and humanity.”

The College’s requirements thus comprise the Gen Ed courses; the distribution courses; expository writing; and learning (or testing out of) a foreign language. Alongside that architecture, the Harvard learners pursue concentrations. In any student’s progress through the College, concentration courses outnumber general-education and distribution requirements; and most ultimately aim, at least in honors fields, for focused research at some frontier of that discipline—a taste of what graduate study might entail. The rest of students’ academic work consists of whatever other electives move them and fit their schedules.

To a greater or lesser extent, that solution prevails at other liberal-arts institutions.

Read more articles by John S. Rosenberg
Related topics

You might also like

For Campus Speech, Civility is a Cultural Practice

A former Harvard College dean reviews Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber’s book Terms of Respect.

Mount Vernon, Historic Preservation, and American Politics

Anne Neal Petri promotes George Washington and historic literacy.

Harvard Funds Student “Bridges” Projects

Eight new initiatives to build community on campus will get underway early next year. 

Most popular

Harvard Faculty Group Proposes Limits on A Grades

The grade inflation measure requires a full faculty vote, expected in the spring.

Martin Nowak Sanctioned for Jeffrey Epstein Involvement

The Faculty of Arts and Sciences announces disciplinary actions.

Why Men Are Falling Behind in Education, Employment, and Health

Can new approaches to education address a growing gender gap?

Explore More From Current Issue

A football player kicking a ball while another teammate holds it on the field.

A Near-Perfect Football Season Ends in Disappointment

A loss to Villanova derails Harvard in the playoffs. 

Black and white photo of a large mushroom cloud rising above the horizon.

Open Book: A New Nuclear Age

Harvard historian Serhii Plokhy’s latest book looks at the rising danger of a new arms race.

A girl sits at a desk, flanked by colorful, stylized figures, evoking a whimsical, surreal atmosphere.

The Trouble with Sidechat

No one feels responsible for what happens on Harvard’s anonymous social media app.